Ch'i of Clouds

 I wrote last month about cloud painting and party ideas from the Mustard Seed Garden Catalogue of Painting—the 17th-Century manual of Chinese brush painting.

I was so intrigued by the lessons on painting and life, that I felt compelled to get a copy of the book myself. My local public library did not have this book in their holdings, so I requested a copy through their Interlibrary Loan Service. Less than a week later, a pristine copy of the book arrived from The Community College of Rhode Island in Warwick.

I scanned the Table of Contents for the chapter on clouds, but found no such chapter. The two-page index listed only the names of Chinese master painters and calligraphers. I looked at the photocopied pages on cloud painting that my mother-in-law had mailed me in December. And then I found these two pages in my book at the end of a section called the "Book of Rocks." I found it odd that clouds were considered rocks and even more odd that the two pages my mother-in-law sent me were the only two pages on clouds in the book.

To me, clouds and rocks were nothing alike. One is earthbound, mostly permanent, solid, hard-edged, dark, often linear, jagged, made of minerals and covered with trees; the other is skybound, transient, vaporous, soft-edged, rounded, sometimes linear or stratified, made a water or ice, and were unfettered, untouched, and unadorned by anything but sunlight. But there were the clouds, both the “small-hook” and “large-hook” style of clouds, in the middle of Rocks.

To my Western eyes, the small- and large-hook style clouds look nothing like clouds. They are composed of short wriggling lines that look like, well, worms crawling across the surface of a rippling stream. There was nothing puffy or vertical or cloudy about them. What did look like clouds, however, were the rocks. The first page of the Book of Rocks features five rocks that are the spitting image of five perfect cumulus clouds (left). Five perfect little cumulus humilis floating in space on the white page. There is nothing to ground them—no tuffs of grass, layer of duff, or suggestion of earth. All five of these rock-shaped clouds are darkly shaded on one side to give them depth and dimension. I am pretty sure they are clouds. I look to the text for an explanation.

"In estimating people…” it begins (a beginning that tells me I am not going to get an answer about my cloud-rock debate)… “their quality of spirit (ch’i) is as basic as the way they are formed; and so it is with rocks, which are the framework of the heavens and of earth and also have ch’i. That is the reason rocks are sometimes spoken of as yun ken (roots of the clouds).”

I stop there. Roots of the clouds. I love this idea! What does it even mean? I cannot even picture roots of clouds. Well, actually I can: a flat and treeless landscape scattered with evenly placed boulders as far as the eye can see, scattered cumulus clouds above, lots of very long, slimy tree roots connecting each boulder to a cloud. It is a surreal and hideous image, a literal and very Western scene. Something Frida Kahlo, Hieronymous Bosch, or Salvador Dali might have painted after seeing a kelp forest. I read on.

“Rocks with ch’i are dead rocks, just as bones with the same vivifying spirit are dry, bare bones. How could a cultivated person paint a lifeless rock?”

The “cultivated” persons I know have done some pretty offensive things in their lives, but painting lifeless rocks has not been one of them. Imagine a time when, to be considered cultivated, you had to paint rocks with ch’i. Imagine a time when you would even ask such a question—How could a cultivated person paint a lifeless rock?—and not get ushered into a psychiatrist’s office.

The next passage, written about rocks, applies equally to clouds—despite their very obvious differences.

“One should certainly never paint rocks without ch’i . To depict rocks without ch'i, it must be sought beyond the material and in the intangible. Nothing is more difficult. If the form of the rock is not clear in ones’ heart (-mind) and therefore at one’s finger tips…the picture can never be completely realized. I have, however, at long last learned that this is not so difficult to achieve.”

I make a note to use this in my next inspirational speech to my sons: It is not difficult to achieve something that can never be completely realized. Now for the E-Z method.

“There are not many secret methods in the painting of rocks. If I may sum it up in a phrase: rocks must be alive.”

My skin tingles and I remember a poem by Mary Oliver, about rocks sleeping in her hand. I have a recording of this poem on a CD in my car. I close The Mustard Seed Garden Catalogue of Painting, pack my laptop and some cloud-painting books in my briefcase, and drive downtown. Mary reads to me from the back seat:

Some Things Say the Wise Ones

Some things, say the wise ones, who know everything,
are not living. I say,
You live your life your way and leave me alone.

I have talked with the faint clouds in the sky when they
are afraid of being left behind; I have said Hurry, hurry!
And they have said, Thank you,we are hurrying.

About cows, and starfish, and roses there is no
argument. They die, after all.

But water is a question, so many living things in it,
bt what is it itself, living or not? Oh gleaming
generosity, how can they write you out?

As I think this I am sitting in the sand beside
the harbor. I am holding in my hand
small pieces of granite, pyrite, schist.
Each one, just now, so thoroughly asleep.

I listen to this poem four times on my way to my writing spot overlooking the water, the gleaming generosity. I listen to this poem and wonder who Mary Oliver’s ‘wise ones’ are. Certainly not the authors of the “Book of Rocks.”

I spend the afternoon looking at the water, the rain, the ripples on the puddles, and a book by American artist and illustrator Eric Sloane (1905-1985). Sloane wrote and illustrated some thirty-eight books in his lifetime. Skies and the Artist: How to Draw Clouds and Sunsets (1950) is one his first. As a non-artist, non-meteorologist, it is one of my favorites. He begins this primer for art students with a discussion of cloud anatomy. Except for the line about ice cream, I could have been reading out of the Mustard Seed Catalogue:

“Although clouds appear motionless, they are really slow explosions. Whether single (cumulus puffs) or solid flat layers (stratoform) they puff and boil continually…..therefore don’t make cloud-masses look like melting mounds of ice cream but like living shapes in graceful action. Do think of cloud action first, then think of cloud shape and outline because shape depends on movement.”

“To put grace into a cloud you must realize that it is a living thing, either in the process of building up or of disintegration.”

Sloane, a self-taught painter and illustrator, has not only expressed the ch’i of clouds, but also something of their yin and yang.

What a day! What a good day. What an enlightening cloudy gray day. Thank you painters and poets, cultivated persons, truly wise ones, keepers of life, seekers of ch’i, stewards of grace.

And the next day, in the pouring rain, I went hiking with my husband along a tributary of the Skokomish River in Olympic National Forest. The nimbostratus clouds were thick overhead, but the forest was drenched in the bright greens of moss, fern, hemlock, and cedar. We took a sidetrail, marked "Confluence" and here is what we saw--living things:

Clouds as Cultural Ambassadors

My mother in law, a talented landscape painter, recently mailed me photocopied pages from The Mustard Seed Garden Manual of Planting. This sounds like something from Burpee Seed Company, but it’s a classic 18th-century reference book on Chinese brush painting. The pages she sent describe the “large hook” (ta kou) and “small hook” (kou) style of brush painting. But the text really isn’t about clouds. I thought to paraphrase the text here, but it is so perfect that I’m decided to excerpt.

“Clouds are the ornaments of the sky and earth, the embroidery of mountains and streams. They may move as swiftly as horses. They may seem to strike a mountain with such force that one almost hears the sound of the impact. Such is the nature (ch’i shih, spirit and structural integration) of clouds. Among the ancients, there were two key methods in painting clouds. First, in vast landscapes of numerous cliffs and valleys, clouds were used to divide (and to hide) parts of the scene. Richly verdant peaks soared into the sky and white scarves of clouds stretching horizontally separated and imprisoned them. Where the clouds parted, green summits rose. As the literati say: ‘In the midst of hustling activity steal moments of quietness.’
Second, in a landscape where mountains and valleys extend into the distance, clouds were used as a means of uniting them. The clouds sometimes filled spaces where there were no mountains or water, billowing like great waves of the ocean and soaring like mountain peaks. As the literati say: ‘Invite guests, recite poems, and improve your style.”
I love these ideas—clouds as “hustling activity” and mountain summits as “ moments of quietness.” I’ve been writing about stillness and dynamism in my book on clouds, which I am calling Still Life with Clouds. I plan to write about painting clouds—my deeply amateurish experience with watercolors, Georgia O’Keeffe’s Celebration, N.C. Wyeth’s luminous cumulus pictures in Scribner’s Illustrated Classics series, the works of local cloud muralists, and now, Chinese brush painters.

“Invite guests, recite poems, and improve your style.” I have never thought of clouds as unifiers or as a metaphor for “style.” A footnote offers a more literal translation of style as “air of culture.” This is different from putting on airs of culture. I am struggling with the metaphor. I try to make it work.

I imagine a landscape without mountains or water. I imagine a space, a life, a capital city without culture. I imagine the clouds compensating by billowing like ocean waves and soaring like mountain peaks. I think of myself (the cloud?) in a frilly apron and holding a silver tray of hors d’ouevres as I welcome guests into my living room. My husband dons a beret and plays Stan Getz on his saxophone. People read poems by Gertrude Stein, Wallace Stevens, and Maya Angelou. Everyone applauds. The room is getting warm. Culture is billowing up. We are filling the empty space. The wine flows, guests read rough drafts of works in progress, a soprano belts out an aria from La Boheme. The atmosphere is changing. Clouds become mountains, our party becomes Times Square.

As a cultural landscape, this has the potential to be a masterpiece. Or at least fun.

Hic et Nunc


This is my pencil cup from Stone Ridge, a Sacred Heart all-girls school I attended from 5th to 7th grade and then again from 9th to 10th grade. The school motto, hic et nunc, means "here and now." I have had this pencil cup for thirty-five years but have yet examine why a Catholic school would stress here and now, instead of there and then. There and then seems to me a more apt motto if you are thinking about there (heaven) and then (the eternity after the now). Not until I began studying clouds--so ephemeral, so transient, so very not here or now--did I start thinking about the motto on my pencil cup or wondering about the three symbols in the shield. I think I can figure out the candle and the hearts, but the hooka in the upper right section is a bit troubling.

I think of myself as a here and now kind of person, which, in terms of spirituality, means I don't hold much stock in heaven of the afterlife. These ideas keep me from focussing on and rejoicing in the heaven at hand, the life that is now. Heaven may be an incentive, but I think it serves as a disincentive for efforts here on Earth. We can behave badly here, be forgiven, and enjoy a better place afterward. A place in the clouds.

Clouds are the antithesis of hic et nunc. They are here, there, and everywhere...now and then. And sometimes they are not. A single cell of a cumulus cloud--is said to last five minutes. That's not much nunc. And, after a year of looking at and studying clouds, I am not sure I could say where exactly they are. In terms of hic, they are elusive. When you spend much time in the company of clouds, you start feeling more grounded, rooted, solid, even slothful. You have to stand still or sit still in order to fully appreciate how dynamic clouds are. You have to be very hic et nunc. Eventually--and I am not quite there yet--you get a glimpse of the stillness in the roiling, sweeping, restlessness of clouds.

Floating on Webster's Clouds


 This is likely the world's smallest sky guide--a mere 1" x 5" inches. I found this simple and  very old-fashioned illustration  under "clouds" in my 1980 Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary.
  I turned to the front of the book to see if I could discover thename of the  illustrator. No credit is given to any illustrator, though the Editor in Chief notes that this edition includes 900 pictorial illustrations  "selected not simply for their decorative function but particularly for their value in clarifying definitions."
  How does Webster's define a cloud? There are six defintions for the noun and four for the verb. The first entry for the noun, the subject of my  book,  comes in two parts:  "a visible mass of particles of water or ice in the form of fog, mist, or haze suspended usu. at considerable height in the air" and "a light, filmy, puffy, or billowy mass seeming to float in the air."
  I love it. A visible mass seeming to float in the air. I got hung up on "seeming." We all talk about clouds floating by, but now someone is telling me they are not actually floating? I now have to admit I don't know what "floating" means. So I turn to that entry in my dictionary: "to rest on the surface of or be suspended in a fluid" and "to drift on or through as if on or through a liquid." Hah! So clouds do float. Or I guess I'd have to use air quotes here (how appropriate!) and say clouds "float."
  Since I'm not a fan of air quotes, I need a better verb to describe what clouds are actually doing up there: Passing by. Rolling in. Forming. Rising. Dissipating. Deteriorating. Raining. Snowing. Shadowing. Confusing.
  Back to the definition of clouds. The etymological notes tell me the noun cloud is often attributed to Middle English "rock" from Old English clud which is, oddly, akin to the Greek gloutos buttock.    
 And, in my exploration of Webster's this morning, I discovered that my treasured dictionary was  produced by a staff that included ten Clerks and Typists (3 Mildreds, 1 Maude, 1 Esther, 1 Maureen, 1 Genevive, 1 Frances, 1 Francine, and 1 Catherine) and a Head of Typing Room, named Evelyn.
    Yes, in addition to being a cloud freak, I am a word geek.